The desired location inside Harper Lee’s novel, “To Kill a Mockingbird,” incorporates a big change throughout the trial of Tom Robinson. Particularly, it options a part of Bob Ewell’s testimony beneath cross-examination by Atticus Finch. This part is essential as a result of it reveals inconsistencies and contradictions in Ewell’s account of the alleged assault, elevating doubts about his credibility.
This portion of the narrative is important for understanding the themes of prejudice, justice, and ethical braveness prevalent all through the ebook. The occasions detailed illuminate the racial bias present throughout the group of Maycomb and exhibit Atticus Finch’s dedication to defending fact and equity, even within the face of overwhelming social stress. It serves as a microcosm of the bigger societal inequalities depicted within the novel and their impression on particular person lives.
Evaluation of the dialogue and descriptions discovered at this level permits for a deeper understanding of the characters concerned and the advanced social dynamics at play within the courtroom. Additional examination permits one to dissect the impression of the testimony on the unfolding occasions and think about its contribution to the general message of the narrative.
1. Bob Ewell’s Testimony
The testimony of Bob Ewell because it unfolds on the specified location constitutes a important juncture within the Tom Robinson trial. It’s by means of Atticus Finch’s examination of Ewell that inconsistencies and potential falsehoods in his account start to floor, shaping the jury’s notion and impacting the trajectory of the narrative.
-
Inconsistent Narrative
Ewell’s account of the occasions previous the alleged assault on Mayella incorporates ambiguities and contradictions, significantly relating to the sequence of occasions and the precise particulars of Mayella’s accidents. Atticus’s questioning exposes these inconsistencies, elevating doubts in regards to the veracity of Ewell’s claims. In actual authorized circumstances, inconsistent testimonies are sometimes used to undermine a witness’s credibility, as is the intent on this occasion.
-
Contradictory Claims of Mayella’s Harm
The precise description of Mayella Ewell’s accidents, together with the facet of her face that was bruised, turns into some extent of competition. Atticus strategically focuses on the placement of those accidents to recommend that they have been inflicted by somebody who’s left-handed. This element straight challenges Ewell’s assertion that Tom Robinson, who has a crippled left arm, was the assailant. Figuring out contradictory damage claims typically performs an important position in forensic investigations, influencing the willpower of guilt or innocence.
-
Atticus Finch’s Cross-Examination Strategies
Atticus’s methodology of questioning Ewell demonstrates his authorized acumen and strategic method to uncovering the reality. He skillfully guides Ewell into revealing inconsistencies and biases by means of seemingly innocuous inquiries. This system is a trademark of efficient cross-examination, aiming to reveal the witness’s motives and reliability. Legal professionals in real-world eventualities make use of related methods to problem witness testimonies and reveal underlying biases.
-
Ewell’s Underlying Prejudice
Ewell’s testimony is saturated with racial slurs and derogatory remarks in direction of Tom Robinson, exposing his deep-seated prejudice. This prejudice isn’t merely private however displays the widespread racial bias prevalent in Maycomb society, influencing his notion of occasions and his motivation to accuse Tom. Prejudice, whether or not overt or implicit, stays a big think about quite a few authorized circumstances, influencing jury selections and perpetuating systemic inequalities.
These aspects of Bob Ewell’s testimony throughout the specified web page vary spotlight the complexities of fact, justice, and prejudice. The contradictions and biases revealed throughout Atticus’s cross-examination underscore the challenges of looking for justice in a society marred by inequality and pre-conceived notions. This testimony serves as a pivotal second within the narrative, influencing the reader’s understanding of the characters’ motivations and the broader themes of the novel.
2. Atticus’s Cross-Examination
Atticus Finch’s cross-examination of Bob Ewell, detailed particularly on that exact location, is a cornerstone of the Tom Robinson trial in Harper Lee’s “To Kill a Mockingbird.” This authorized maneuver exposes important inconsistencies in Ewell’s testimony, highlighting the racial prejudices at play and difficult the prevailing societal biases inside Maycomb.
-
Unveiling Inconsistencies in Ewell’s Account
Atticus’s strategic questioning methodically unveils discrepancies in Ewell’s narrative. The main points surrounding Mayella Ewell’s accidents, the sequence of occasions, and Ewell’s location throughout the alleged assault are rigorously examined. Comparable techniques are employed in real-world authorized settings to undermine witness credibility. By highlighting these inconsistencies, Atticus casts doubt on the veracity of Ewell’s claims, elevating considerations in regards to the validity of the prosecution’s case.
-
Exposing Racial Bias and Prejudice
Throughout the cross-examination, Ewell’s deeply rooted racial prejudices grow to be evident by means of derogatory language and biased assumptions about Tom Robinson. This displays the pervasive racism inside Maycomb society, the place the phrase of a white man, no matter his character, is commonly prioritized over that of a Black man. Actual-world parallels exist in circumstances the place racial bias influences authorized proceedings, leading to unjust outcomes. The cross-examination reveals how private biases can distort perceptions and impression the pursuit of justice.
-
Highlighting Ewell’s Lack of Credibility
Atticus’s adept questioning reveals Ewell’s lack of credibility, positioning him as an unreliable witness. The inconsistencies in his testimony, mixed together with his evident prejudice, undermine his character and motivations. This strategic discrediting of a witness is a typical follow in authorized trials, aiming to influence the jury to query the validity of their claims. Within the context of that web page, it is a pivotal second to vary the course of the trial.
-
The Left-Handedness Revelation
An important factor of the cross-examination entails Atticus probing Ewell’s capability to put in writing together with his left hand. This element means that Mayella’s accidents, particularly these on the correct facet of her face, may have been inflicted by a left-handed particular person, straight implicating Ewell himself. This revelation challenges Ewell’s model of occasions and strengthens the protection’s argument that Tom Robinson was not the assailant. Forensic proof and professional evaluation of accidents typically play a important position in prison investigations, mirroring Atticus’s cautious consideration of bodily particulars.
The aspects of Atticus’s cross-examination, as evidenced, collectively serve to reveal the issues within the prosecution’s case and underscore the pervasive racial injustices prevalent in Maycomb. By skillfully questioning Ewell and highlighting the inconsistencies in his testimony, Atticus makes an attempt to degree the enjoying area and advocate for a good trial for Tom Robinson, illustrating the complexities of fact, justice, and prejudice throughout the context of the novel.
3. Contradictions Uncovered
The section recognized by the specification gives a important illustration of contradictions throughout the testimony of Bob Ewell. These inconsistencies should not merely minor discrepancies however characterize elementary flaws in his account of the occasions surrounding Mayella Ewell’s alleged assault. The extraction of those contradictions is the direct results of Atticus Finch’s cross-examination, the place centered questioning reveals inconsistencies in Ewell’s story, impacting his general credibility as a witness. For instance, the shifting particulars of the accidents Mayella sustained and the timeline of occasions main as much as the alleged assault grow to be factors of competition when scrutinized. These contradictions function an important element as a result of they supply cheap doubt, difficult the prosecution’s narrative and creating the opportunity of Tom Robinson’s innocence.
These contradictions are demonstrably essential as a result of they permit the jury to evaluate the reliability of Ewell’s claims. Actual-world authorized proceedings typically hinge on the credibility of witnesses; exposing contradictions of their testimony can alter the course of a trial. Moreover, the main points revealed can have the sensible significance of adjusting the jurys notion of the individuals concerned and to the motives behind the testimony. In prison circumstances, protection methods typically goal to focus on conflicting statements or proof, simply as Atticus does right here, to exhibit that the prosecution’s case rests on shaky grounds.
In abstract, the uncovered contradictions should not an incidental factor however an important element of understanding the desired passage. They’re the results of deliberate questioning, serve to undermine a key witness’s testimony, and carry vital weight within the context of the trial’s broader themes of fact, justice, and prejudice. They underscore the inherent difficulties in acquiring justice inside a group pushed by bias and preconceived notions.
4. Ewell’s Credibility Questioned
The questioning of Bob Ewell’s credibility throughout the specified part is central to the unfolding narrative of “To Kill a Mockingbird.” This factor emerges straight from Atticus Finch’s cross-examination, the place discrepancies and inconsistencies in Ewell’s testimony are methodically revealed. The impression of this scrutiny is substantial, because it challenges the premise of the prosecution’s case towards Tom Robinson, elevating doubts in regards to the veracity of the accusations. An actual-world parallel exists in authorized settings, the place a witness’s lack of credibility can considerably affect a jury’s verdict, shifting the burden of proof and altering the course of a trial. In impact, the problem to Ewell’s credibility turns into a pivotal turning level, prompting the reader, and doubtlessly the jury throughout the novel’s context, to reassess the occasions primarily based on his account.
The importance of Ewell’s diminished credibility extends past the rapid authorized proceedings. It exposes the inherent prejudices and societal biases prevalent in Maycomb. Ewell’s unreliable testimony displays a broader sample of racial discrimination, the place the phrase of a white man, even one among questionable character, is commonly valued above that of a Black man. This dynamic is mirrored in historic examples of racially biased court docket circumstances, the place prejudiced testimony has contributed to unjust convictions. The questioning of Ewell’s credibility, subsequently, turns into a automobile for illustrating the systemic inequalities that underpin the trial and the group’s ethical panorama.
Finally, the challenges to Bob Ewell’s credibility, as they unfold inside that section, serve to focus on the complexities of fact, justice, and prejudice. The inconsistencies and biases uncovered throughout Atticus’s cross-examination underscore the challenges of looking for justice in a society marred by inequality and preconceived notions. This element of the textual content is a vital factor, affecting the story, influencing the reader’s understanding of the characters’ motivations, and reinforcing the broader themes of the narrative.
5. Mayella’s Harm Account
The testimony relating to Mayella Ewell’s accidents, as offered within the specified textual section, is central to the prosecution’s case towards Tom Robinson. This account, delivered primarily by means of Bob Ewell’s testimony and supposed to determine the character of the alleged assault, is topic to rigorous scrutiny and turns into a focus for Atticus Finch’s cross-examination.
-
Description of Accidents
The main points of Mayella’s accidents are described as primarily targeting the correct facet of her face, particularly a black eye. This description is critical as a result of it suggests the assailant was doubtless left-handed, a element that turns into related when contemplating Tom Robinson’s bodily limitations. In real-world forensic evaluation, the placement and nature of accidents are important in figuring out the potential traits of the perpetrator.
-
Inconsistencies and Contradictions
The presentation of Mayella’s damage account incorporates inconsistencies that undermine its credibility. Atticus Finch skillfully attracts consideration to those contradictions, elevating doubts in regards to the veracity of the testimony. Actual-world authorized proceedings typically hinge on the consistency of witness statements, and discrepancies can forged vital doubt on all the narrative.
-
The Function of Prejudice
The acceptance of Mayella’s damage account is closely influenced by the racial prejudice prevalent in Maycomb. Regardless of the inconsistencies, the belief that Tom Robinson, a Black man, is responsible primarily based on his race alone performs a big position in shaping perceptions. Traditionally, biased assumptions have led to misinterpretations of proof and unjust verdicts in numerous circumstances.
-
Impression on the Trial’s Final result
Mayella’s damage account, although questionable, contributes considerably to the trial’s consequence. The jury, influenced by racial bias and swayed by the emotional nature of the testimony, finally convicts Tom Robinson. This exemplifies how the presentation and interpretation of bodily proof could be manipulated to help predetermined conclusions, significantly within the presence of prejudice.
The intricacies of Mayella’s account, dissected by means of examination of this section, reveal the advanced interaction of proof, prejudice, and notion throughout the justice system. It serves as a strong illustration of how societal biases can distort the pursuit of fact and affect the end result of authorized proceedings, additional highlighting the thematic considerations inside “To Kill a Mockingbird.”
6. Left-Handedness Element
The element relating to left-handedness, because it seems, is a important element of Atticus Finch’s cross-examination of Bob Ewell. This element arises straight from the testimony discovered at this juncture, the place Atticus questions Ewell about his capability to put in writing together with his left hand. The importance stems from the bodily proof associated to Mayella Ewell’s accidents, significantly the bruising on the correct facet of her face. The implication is {that a} left-handed particular person doubtless inflicted these accidents, contradicting Ewell’s accusation towards Tom Robinson, whose left arm is crippled. This connection underscores the significance of seemingly minor particulars in revealing inconsistencies inside a witness’s testimony. An actual-world parallel exists in forensic investigations the place handedness is taken into account when analyzing crime scenes and suspect profiles.
The sensible significance lies in its capability to problem the prevailing racial biases of the time. By introducing a believable different suspect, Atticus goals to create cheap doubt within the minds of the jury, forcing them to rethink their preconceived notions about Tom Robinson’s guilt. With out the deal with left-handedness, the jury could also be extra inclined to just accept Ewell’s account at face worth, furthering the unjust consequence. The element connects on to Ewell’s motive for fabricating the story, shielding his personal potential involvement in Mayella’s accidents. The shortage of forensic experience could have affected the story on this scenario, on condition that the accidents, although inconsistent, may have been investigated utilizing modern strategies.
In conclusion, the left-handedness element isn’t an remoted level however a pivotal factor in Atticus Finch’s technique to reveal the contradictions and biases current within the trial. It illustrates the facility of forensic reasoning and its potential to disrupt established narratives, even within the face of deeply ingrained prejudice. Challenges to accepted social norms have been on the coronary heart of this element, contributing to the general exploration of societal injustice inherent in “To Kill a Mockingbird.”
7. Racial Prejudice Current
The desired textual content in Harper Lee’s “To Kill a Mockingbird” serves as a stark illustration of the pervasive racial prejudice deeply embedded throughout the societal cloth of Maycomb County. This prejudice manifests overtly by means of Bob Ewell’s testimony, the place his accusations towards Tom Robinson are rooted in racist assumptions reasonably than concrete proof. Ewell’s willingness to manufacture a narrative and the convenience with which the group accepts his model of occasions spotlight the diminished worth positioned on the lives and experiences of Black people throughout that period. The prejudiced attitudes current contribute on to the injustice confronted by Tom Robinson, influencing the jury’s notion and finally resulting in his wrongful conviction. Traditionally, related eventualities have unfolded in numerous circumstances the place racial bias has tainted authorized proceedings, leading to discriminatory outcomes.
The significance of recognizing the racial prejudice displayed at this level within the narrative is important for understanding the novel’s broader themes. It permits for a deeper examination of the facility dynamics at play, the place racial biases override cause and equity. The cross-examination of Bob Ewell, supposed to disclose inconsistencies in his testimony, is consistently overshadowed by the unstated assumption of Tom Robinson’s guilt primarily based solely on his race. This prejudiced setting underscores the systemic inequalities that exist inside Maycomb’s authorized and social buildings. Consciousness of this prejudice necessitates a important evaluation of how implicit biases can affect judgments and perpetuate discriminatory practices in real-world contexts, not restricted to the previous. Comparable influences proceed to occur immediately in much less overtly racist circumstances.
Understanding the connection between racial prejudice and the occasions described is important for recognizing the novel’s enduring relevance. The challenges offered on this a part of the ebook supply insights into the complexities of combating ingrained societal biases and the difficulties related to attaining true justice and equality. The presence of racial prejudice isn’t merely a backdrop to the narrative; it’s a central driving pressure that shapes the characters’ actions, influences the trial’s consequence, and underscores the continued wrestle for racial equality. This section of the ebook gives a helpful alternative to mirror on the impression of prejudice and the significance of actively difficult discriminatory beliefs and practices.
8. Trial’s Pivotal Second
The section marked by the reference inside Harper Lees “To Kill a Mockingbird” constitutes a pivotal second within the Tom Robinson trial. Particularly, it encompasses Atticus Finch’s rigorous cross-examination of Bob Ewell. This interrogation exposes vital inconsistencies inside Ewell’s testimony, straight difficult his credibility and the validity of his accusations towards Robinson. The meticulous unraveling of Ewell’s narrative, achieved by means of exact questioning, marks a turning level within the reader’s notion of the case and the probability of Robinson’s guilt. The implications of this testimony have a profound impression. This singular level is important in understanding the trials evolution as a result of it units in movement a sequence of doubt that challenges the prevailing racial biases throughout the courtroom and the Maycomb group. An actual-life parallel could be drawn to numerous authorized circumstances the place a witness’s testimony, when scrutinized, reveals important flaws, subsequently altering the course of the trial and influencing the jury’s deliberation. The efficient questioning of the plaintiff is an try at displaying the jury he’s not a dependable man.
The sensible significance of recognizing this second as pivotal lies in its illustration of the facility of authorized technique and the significance of due course of. Atticus Finch’s method demonstrates the essential position of a protection legal professional in advocating for the accused, significantly within the face of overwhelming societal prejudice. The courtroom setting, often biased to imagine the plaintiff has no in poor health intentions, is turned the other way up by Atticus Finch’s technique. The element can also be essential when understanding extra real-life circumstances in court docket the place justice is required most. The revelations on the section underscore the fragility of justice when influenced by bias. The element serves as a case examine of how expert authorized techniques can doubtlessly problem prejudiced assumptions, even inside a system stacked towards the defendant.
Finally, section illustrates a turning level not solely throughout the narrative of “To Kill a Mockingbird” but in addition throughout the broader themes of justice, prejudice, and ethical braveness. It highlights the challenges inherent in confronting societal biases and the enduring significance of looking for fact within the face of adversity. The trial, though finally leading to an unjust verdict, showcases the opportunity of difficult entrenched prejudices, even inside a flawed authorized system. This particular section acts as a microcosm of the bigger wrestle for equality and justice. It serves as a cautionary story in regards to the ease with which prejudice can distort perceptions and the need of remaining vigilant within the pursuit of fact and equity. Nonetheless, this additionally illustrates the issue of adjusting a group’s perception on racial points, as they’re much less more likely to ever present they modified their thoughts.
9. Injustice Manifested
The intersection of the described passage of Harper Lee’s “To Kill a Mockingbird” and the theme of “Injustice Manifested” is direct and profound. On that section, the trial of Tom Robinson is in progress. Bob Ewell’s testimony, and Atticus Finch’s try to convey out its fallacies, is a transparent demonstration of racial prejudice and the dearth of equal therapy beneath the legislation, that’s to say, injustice. Particularly, the main points offered in Ewell’s testimony, the biases inherent locally’s notion of Robinson, and the flawed authorized course of collectively contribute to an setting the place injustice prevails. The element of the section turns into a microcosm of the systemic inequalities that permeate Maycomb society, showcasing the tangible penalties of prejudice inside a authorized framework.
The understanding of this connection has sensible significance in analyzing historic and modern parallels. In real-world examples, such because the Scottsboro Boys case of the Nineteen Thirties, racial bias performed a decisive position in wrongful convictions. The failings throughout the authorized system are, many instances, used to discriminate on a racial motive. It’s attainable to see many circumstances which have led to harmless males serving prolonged sentences and later being acquitted. Equally, circumstances involving coerced confessions or unreliable eyewitness testimony typically exhibit how injustice can manifest inside authorized proceedings. By recognizing the patterns of bias and flawed reasoning depicted in, authorized professionals and social justice advocates can work to determine and tackle related points in fashionable authorized techniques, selling equity and fairness.
In conclusion, the presence of “Injustice Manifested” within the location specified isn’t merely a thematic factor however a central element of the narrative’s commentary on societal inequalities. The challenges lie in recognizing and dismantling the ingrained prejudices that enable such injustices to persist. By understanding the connection between the occasions that occur and the outcomes that resulted from them, people can grow to be higher geared up to advocate for systemic change and make sure that authorized techniques try for simply and equitable outcomes for all members of society.
Regularly Requested Questions Relating to Harper Lee’s “To Kill a Mockingbird,” Particular Web page
The next questions tackle frequent factors of inquiry and supply detailed explanations relating to the related section.
Query 1: What transpires on the recognized web page of “To Kill a Mockingbird”?
The section contains a portion of Bob Ewell’s testimony throughout the Tom Robinson trial. It facilities on Atticus Finch’s cross-examination, the place inconsistencies in Ewell’s account start to floor. The dialogue entails the character of Mayella Ewell’s accidents and the occasions main as much as the alleged assault.
Query 2: Why is Ewell’s testimony on the desired web page thought-about vital?
Ewell’s testimony is essential as a result of it units the stage for questioning his credibility. The uncovered inconsistencies function a basis for suggesting that his model of occasions is fabricated. His testimony, influenced by racial prejudice, types the premise for the prosecution’s case, making its examination important to understanding the trial’s dynamics.
Query 3: What inconsistencies are revealed throughout Atticus Finch’s cross-examination?
Atticus focuses on discrepancies inside Ewell’s account of Mayella’s accidents, particularly the facet of her face that was bruised. This results in the revelation that the accidents may have been inflicted by a left-handed particular person, a element that contradicts Ewell’s claims given Tom Robinson’s bodily limitations.
Query 4: How does the factor of left-handedness have an effect on the trial?
The left-handedness element introduces cheap doubt relating to Tom Robinson’s guilt. It means that Bob Ewell, who’s doubtlessly left-handed, may have been the precise assailant. This revelation challenges the jury’s presumptions primarily based on racial bias and the Ewell household’s social standing.
Query 5: In what methods does racial prejudice affect the occasions depicted on this part?
Racial prejudice underpins all the trial and is obvious in Ewell’s accusations. The presumption of Tom Robinson’s guilt, solely primarily based on his race, permeates the courtroom environment and influences the jury’s notion of the proof. The group’s acceptance of Ewell’s testimony, regardless of its inconsistencies, is a direct manifestation of this prejudice.
Query 6: What broader themes does this part of the ebook exemplify?
This excerpt embodies a number of themes central to “To Kill a Mockingbird,” together with justice, injustice, prejudice, and ethical braveness. It highlights the complexities of looking for fact in a society marred by racial bias and the challenges of upholding moral ideas within the face of societal stress. The section successfully demonstrates the vulnerability of marginalized people inside a flawed authorized system.
The evaluation gives perception into the intricate particulars and their broader implications.
The subsequent part explores the broader themes.
Navigating Advanced Testimony
The cross-examination of Bob Ewell gives helpful insights into analyzing and deciphering advanced witness testimony. Understanding the nuances of this change enhances comprehension of authorized methods and societal biases current inside “To Kill a Mockingbird.”
Tip 1: Establish Inconsistencies. Discrepancies inside a witness’s account are key indicators of potential falsehoods. Scrutinize timelines, bodily descriptions, and sequences of occasions for conflicting particulars. Atticus Finch successfully employed this system to undermine Ewell’s narrative.
Tip 2: Acknowledge the Affect of Bias. Preconceived notions and prejudices can considerably skew perceptions. Consider how societal biases may have an effect on a witness’s statements and the reception of these statements by others. Bob Ewell’s racist attitudes coloured his testimony, influencing the jury’s preliminary impressions.
Tip 3: Take into account the Supply’s Credibility. Assess the witness’s character, background, and potential motivations. Decide if they’ve any vested pursuits or causes to distort the reality. Ewell’s lack of credibility stemmed from his historical past of dishonesty and his want to guard his status.
Tip 4: Analyze Physique Language and Demeanor. Nonverbal cues can present further perception right into a witness’s truthfulness. Observe any indicators of nervousness, hesitation, or defensiveness. Whereas not explicitly described, inferences about Ewell’s demeanor could be drawn from his evasive responses.
Tip 5: Perceive the Context of the Setting. Acknowledge the historic, social, and authorized setting of the examination in progress. How do the biases, if there are any, impact the way in which that one interprets testimony. The time of the testimony and the circumstances of the trial, may impact its consequence.
Tip 6: Pay Consideration to Particulars. Particulars typically make up what composes the massive image. The main points within the testitomy needs to be examined totally, even when it seems trivial at first. The handedness instance is a transparent indicator {that a} tiny element can affect the narrative.
Cautious consideration to inconsistencies, biases, credibility, and surrounding circumstances permits for a extra thorough understanding. These factors are key when comprehending the nuances of authorized proceedings, be it in a courtroom or from a piece of fiction. When analyzing these key elements, the understanding of a witness turns into extra clear, and reveals how that affect involves be within the narrative.
The understanding permits for a deeper appreciation of the themes explored in “To Kill a Mockingbird,” with a selected deal with the fallacies inside human notion.
Evaluation of the Bob Ewell Testimony
The examination of the desired textual content from Harper Lee’s “To Kill a Mockingbird” reveals a important juncture within the Tom Robinson trial. The section, specializing in Bob Ewell’s testimony and Atticus Finch’s cross-examination, highlights inconsistencies, prejudices, and the fragility of fact inside a biased authorized system. Key parts equivalent to the outline of Mayella’s accidents, the introduction of the left-handedness element, and the overt show of racial prejudice all contribute to a deeper understanding of the novel’s central themes. The evaluation underscores the significance of scrutinizing witness testimonies, recognizing societal biases, and advocating for justice within the face of adversity.
The occasions that unfold in “To Kill a Mockingbird” function a reminder of the enduring want for vigilance within the pursuit of equity and fairness. Continued examination of the complexities on this section permits the world to have higher evaluation on the present state of our society. The world can take perception to combat and forestall the injustices of any system or entity, be it judicial, political, or company.
